{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/presentation/2/context.json","@id":"https://repo.library.stonybrook.edu/cantaloupe/iiif/2/manifest.json","@type":"sc:Manifest","label":"If It's Important It's About Me: How Subjective Importance Leads to Self-referential Attributions","metadata":[{"label":"dc.description.sponsorship","value":"This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree"},{"label":"dc.format","value":"Monograph"},{"label":"dc.format.medium","value":"Electronic Resource"},{"label":"dc.format.mimetype","value":"Application/PDF"},{"label":"dc.identifier.uri","value":"http://hdl.handle.net/11401/78329"},{"label":"dc.language.iso","value":"en_US"},{"label":"dcterms.abstract","value":"This work examined how experiences of subjective importance impact self-referential thought. Previous work has demonstrated that valence (i.e., the goodness vs. badness of stimuli) helps people make self-referential attributions, by leading them to over-attribute to themselves good outcomes. I propose that experiences of subjective importance also help people make self-referential attributions, arguably in a more flexible manner. My theorizing builds on separate research literatures indicating that information related to the self is processed in specialized ways and that implicit attributions impact how stimuli are interpreted. I hypothesized that the more important people judge a stimulus to be, the more likely they will be to interpret it to refer to themselves. I tested this hypothesis in three experiments that each examined whether research participants report that subjectively important stimuli previously were evaluated in reference to themselves rather than to an \u201cother\u201d target. The first experiment measured ongoing experiences of importance using event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the mechanism that may drive the effect. I focused on the \u201coddball\u201d P300, an ERP marker of increased attention to infrequently presented stimulus categories, to operationalize a person\u2019s experience of importance. The second and third studies used words not presented in reference to the self or to an \u201cother\u201d target, to test if the proposed biasing effect of importance is a memory bias or an evaluative bias. Mixed support was found for the proposed effect using multi-level modeling for data analysis. Despite the mixed nature of the results, important boundary conditions emerged. Subjective importance generally biased self-attributions; however, the pattern of results varied based on who the \u201cother\u201d target was. ERP-indexed importance, measured during an earlier encounter of the stimulus, did not predict self-referential attributions made later. Taken together, the results across the experiments suggest that the self-referential bias is an evaluative rather than memory-based process, which varies as a function of characteristics of the \u201cother\u201d target (such as how important or favorably they are evaluated to be). These findings help clarify how subjective importance influences self-referential judgments, with implications for numerous intra- and inter-personal phenomena."},{"label":"dcterms.available","value":"2018-07-09T13:26:14Z"},{"label":"dcterms.contributor","value":"Rajaram, Suparna"},{"label":"dcterms.creator","value":"Culcea, Ileana Claudia"},{"label":"dcterms.dateAccepted","value":"2018-07-09T13:26:14Z"},{"label":"dcterms.dateSubmitted","value":"2018-07-09T13:26:14Z"},{"label":"dcterms.description","value":"Department of Social/Health Psychology."},{"label":"dcterms.extent","value":"70 pg."},{"label":"dcterms.format","value":"Monograph"},{"label":"dcterms.identifier","value":"http://hdl.handle.net/11401/78329"},{"label":"dcterms.issued","value":"2017-08-01"},{"label":"dcterms.language","value":"en_US"},{"label":"dcterms.provenance","value":"Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-09T13:26:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1\nCulcea_grad.sunysb_0771E_13463.pdf: 1285885 bytes, checksum: d3908c2d92c87c3dd0073c2babf37dda (MD5)\n  Previous issue date: 2017-08-01"},{"label":"dcterms.subject","value":"Self-referential information"},{"label":"dcterms.title","value":"If It's Important It's About Me: How Subjective Importance Leads to Self-referential Attributions"},{"label":"dcterms.type","value":"Dissertation"},{"label":"dc.type","value":"Dissertation"}],"description":"This manifest was generated dynamically","viewingDirection":"left-to-right","sequences":[{"@type":"sc:Sequence","canvases":[{"@id":"https://repo.library.stonybrook.edu/cantaloupe/iiif/2/canvas/page-1.json","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"Page 1","height":1650,"width":1275,"images":[{"@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://repo.library.stonybrook.edu/cantaloupe/iiif/2/11%2F17%2F48%2F111748172530154459743676949209454639608/full/full/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","height":1650,"width":1275,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://repo.library.stonybrook.edu/cantaloupe/iiif/2/11%2F17%2F48%2F111748172530154459743676949209454639608","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://repo.library.stonybrook.edu/cantaloupe/iiif/2/canvas/page-1.json"}]}]}]}